News Articles March 24, 2010 Part Two
-
March 24, 2010
Posted on Mar. 24, 2010
Quick summary of today’s news articles (Full text of articles follows):
- For wealthy Nigerian businessman Gilbert Chagoury and others like him, a place on the U.S. government’s recently expanded terrorist no-fly list has not turned out to be a major impediment to a jet-setting lifestyle. That’s because a loophole in the Transportation Security Administration’s security regulations does not require any screening for those flying domestically on a privately-owned aircraft, no matter how large.
- Major General Robert A. Harding (ret.) recently appeared before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for a confirmation hearing to be administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. He sailed through with high praise.
- As the Senate considered a bill that would set the course for the FAA over the next two years, general aviation supporters in the Senate worked to ensure that the final bill would include benefits for GA.
- The World Trade Organization ruled that European governments unfairly financed planemaker Airbus’ battle against U.S. rival Boeing, officials said, even as the France-based Airbus claimed the decision as a victory.
- The Pentagon said on Tuesday it remains in active talks with Europe’s EADS on extending the May 10 deadline for aerial tanker bids, while Boeing Co supporters in Congress seized on a WTO ruling to reject any deal with the parent of Airbus as reckless.
AVIATION SECURITY
Want to Fly Through a Loophole in the No-Fly List? Buy a Plane
By MATTHEW MOSK, ERIC LONGABARDI, and RICHARD ESPOSITO
ABC News
3/23/2010For wealthy Nigerian businessman Gilbert Chagoury and others like him, a
place on the U.S. government’s recently expanded terrorist no-fly list has
not turned out to be a major impediment to a jet-setting lifestyle.That’s because a loophole in the Transportation Security Administration’s
security regulations does not require any screening for those flying
domestically on a privately-owned aircraft, no matter how large.Both TSA officials and FBI Terrorist Screening Center director Timothy
Healy confirmed to ABC News last week that the effort to keep U.S. airspace
off-limits to terror suspects has not included vetting the passengers and
pilots on large private jets such as the one owned by Chagoury, which he
has used to shuttle between Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York and Europe.Greg Soule, a TSA spokesman, said the agency has been working for some time
on a fix to toughen the restrictions for non-commercial jets.“We’re working with industry to strengthen security for private planes that
have previously gone unregulated,” Soule said.No-Fly List Has Doubled Since ChristmasNo-Fly Terror List Includes Big
Financial Backer of ClintonMore from Brian Ross and the Investigative
TeamDespite the loophole, Chagoury’s movements did not totally escape
notice. In January, the wealthy philanthropist, who has been a significant
financial supporter of former President Bill Clinton, was stopped from
boarding his private jet as it was undergoing repairs at Teterboro Airport
in northern New Jersey, according to a report of the incident provided to
ABCNews.com.The report says that law enforcement authorities discovered Chagoury was a
“positive match” to the Gilbert Chagoury on the terrorism no-fly list,
based on his date of birth. He was traveling on a British passport, which
does not require a U.S. visa to enter the country. The report said Chagoury
was also named on a second watch list called TIDE, the Terrorist Identities
Datamart Environment, maintained by the National Counterterrorism Center.Chagoury’s son, Gilbert Jr., confirmed last month that his father was
detained by TSA officers at Teterboro. A report of the incident said agents
from the FBI and Customs and Border Patrol asked Chagoury, four other
passengers and two crew members to wait for several hours before they were
permitted to board the jet and depart for Paris.The brief detention provided the first public indication that Chagoury had
been placed on any watch list, and because the government never comments on
individual names on the no-fly list, it is unknown whether he remains on
either list. Reached Monday, Chagoury’s son said that neither he nor his
father wished to discuss the matter.A spokesperson for the Terrorist Screening Center last month declined to
comment about Chagoury. The spokesperson did say the list is “fluid” and
individuals may be moved up or downgraded at any time based on the current
threat environment, but “an individual’s social status, financial means,
and political affiliations are not considered” in an individual being moved
up or down the list.Well before Chagoury was detained, flight records for his Dassault Falcon
show the private aircraft had been making frequent trips both inside and
outside the U.S.Unlike commercial airline passengers, who are screened against the no-fly
list both on domestic and international flights, there is no requirement
that those on the private aircraft be screened during domestic travel,
according to Healy, who heads the Terrorist Screening Center. Healy said
that was something the TSA was “working on.“The current security rules for non-commercial travelers only impact
operators of charter aircraft. TSA requires charter companies handling
flights on large aircraft to properly vet all passengers and employees,
including checking them against the no-fly list. They also require
passenger checks for flights entering or leaving the U.S. Those
requirements could be expanded soon, TSA officials said.In October 2008, TSA proposed new security measures for private general
aviation aircraft. But they encountered resistance from some advocates for
privately-owned planes. After seeking public comment, the TSA is preparing
a new set of security rules for aircraft not currently regulated under
other programs, Soule said.“This draft proposal will represent a significant strengthening of general
aviation security and enhances other post-9/11 measures,” he said.Ed Bolen, the president and CEO of the National Business Aviation
Association, has been monitoring the rules and said he believes the level
of passenger scrutiny will increase with the takeoff weight of the
aircraft. “Their reasoning is that large aircraft are significantly more
capable of doing damage,” he said.Soule said the process is “still very much ongoing,” with a period for
public input expected to come later this year. “Until that time, it is
premature to draw conclusions about the final rule. Americans can rest
assured that whatever final policy emerges, it will represent a
strengthening of general aviation security,” he said.In the days since the January incident, it appears that Chagoury has been
free to continue to take to the skies. His plane crossed the Atlantic twice
in February, according to publicly available flight records. Described as a
billionaire, Chagoury runs an industrial conglomerate in Nigeria, the
Chagoury Group. In 2009 Chagoury pledged $1 billion via the Chagoury Group
as part of his commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, according to
the Global Initiative website. Chagoury also recently donated more than $1
million to the Clinton Foundation, according to a list of donors made
public by the foundation in December. Members of Chagoury’s family were
contributors to the 2008 Presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.A Clinton spokesman, Matt McKenna, said last month that the former
President’s office was unaware of the incident until contacted by
ABCNews.com. “We had no role whatsoever” in helping Chagoury get permission
to resume his travels, said McKenna. “Nor would we ever,” he added.Eric Longabardi is an award-winning producer and investigative journalist
who is a frequent contributor to the Blotter, ABCNews.com’s investigative
page.TSA nominee sails through confirmation hearing
Posted by Charles Spence
General Aviation News
3/23/2010Major General Robert A. Harding (ret.) recently appeared before the Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for a confirmation
hearing to be administrator of the Transportation Security Administration
and assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. He sailed
through with high praise.Sen. John “Jay” Rockefeller (D-WVa), committee chairman, declared a highly
qualified, strong administrator is needed to lead the TSA and its
workforce. He said Harding’s career in both government and the private
sector “makes him a good fit for this mission.” Harding had been director
of operations for the Defense Intelligence Agency and director of
intelligence for the Army’s U.S. Southern Command, among several other
positions.Rockefeller told Harding he was especially concerned about the security of
general aviation and would want to talk with him about it if confirmed.
Rockefeller declared he was not talking about “crop dusters and other small
aircraft, but jets on up.” He added that general aviation was an issue
rarely discussed, but one that need discussing.Harding is expected to be confirmed by the Senate.
FAA REAUTHORIZATION
Senate GA supporters spoke out for industry in FAA bill
By AOPA ePublishing staff
AOPA Website
3/23/2010As the Senate considered a bill that would set the course for the FAA over
the next two years, general aviation supporters in the Senate worked to
ensure that the final bill would include benefits for GA.The $34.5 billion, two-year Senate FAA reauthorization bill, which passed
93 to 0, focuses on modernizing the air traffic control system. It would
fund modernization in part by an increase in general aviation jet fuel
taxes-21.9 cents to 36 cents per gallon-but would not impose any new user
fees.Leading up to the passage of the bill March 22, members of the GA Caucus
and other GA supporters worked to include provisions in the bill that would
minimize the burden of regulations on the industry. While not every
amendment made it to the final bill, senators’ efforts to include GA in
considerations reflected growing understanding of GA on Capitol Hill.Sen. John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate
Commerce Committee, said “airports are economic engines for many small
communities, and everyone, everywhere, needs to be connected to our
national air transportation system.“Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.), chair of the aviation subcommittee, spoke on
the Senate floor about the value of small aircraft-“to travel around the
state and the country to do commerce, to haul parts, to haul people.“
Dorgan explained the importance of business aircraft and that GA
encompasses medical flights, transportation for troops reuniting with their
families, relief flights to Haiti, and more.“The legislation we have created has things that are so important to all of
aviation-yes, commercial aviation, but to general aviation and to private
pilots as well,” he said.GA Caucus co-chair Mark Begich (D-Alaska) said he was pleased with the
legislation. “You can’t go wrong with a bill that creates jobs, improves
the safety and efficiency of air travel, and invests in our airports,” he
said. “Many of our communities have no road or ferry access. Aviation is
our lifeline as many Alaskans rely completely on small aircraft to keep our
communities connected.“Mike Johanns (R-Neb.), the other GA Caucus co-chair, proposed amendments to
ensure that equipment upgrade requirements would show a clear benefit
without imposing an undue financial burden for small-aircraft owners.“It is important to remember that the FAA’s responsibility goes beyond
large airports and commercial airlines; rural airports and general aviation
are sometimes hit much harder by federal regulations, which can cause a
ripple effect in states like Nebraska,” Johanns said. “I am pleased the FAA
Reauthorization bill now includes specific acknowledgement of these smaller
yet significant contributors to our state economy and our aviation system
as a whole.“The bill establishes deadlines for equipage with NextGen technologies such
as Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B); one of Johanns’
amendments would require the FAA to first publish rules setting the
standards for equipage so that operators would not absorb the cost of new
equipment without clear directions from the FAA. Other Johanns amendments
would require the FAA administrator to identify the benefits of the
transition to satellite-based navigation for small- and medium-sized
airports and GA users and require the Government Accountability Office to
study the impact of increases in aviation fuel prices.TANKER CONTROVERSY
WTO rules against Airbus, sources say
By BRADLEY S. KLAPPER
Associated Press
3/24/2010GENEVA – The World Trade Organization ruled that European governments
unfairly financed planemaker Airbus’ battle against U.S. rival Boeing,
officials said, even as the France-based Airbus claimed the decision as a
victory.Three officials with knowledge of the confidential WTO ruling Tuesday in
the long-running trade dispute said it upheld findings of an interim
decision handed down last September that faulted European governments for
providing Airbus with subsidies through risk-free loans, research funding
and infrastructure support.Airbus, however, said “70 percent of the U.S. claims were rejected” and
that the WTO panel dismissed Boeing’s claim that its performance suffered
as a result of European subsidies. In that case, it would be a victory for
Airbus and the European Union ahead of a possible June ruling on alleged
U.S. subsidies to The Boeing Co.While the WTO’s report won’t halt European subsidies for Airbus, the two
disputes could provide tighter guidelines for how far governments can go in
supporting companies in a market worth more than $3 trillion over the next
two decades.With emerging powers such as China looking to break the two-company
dominance of the airliner industry, clearer rules on public support will
become even more important in the future.The three officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity
because of the sensitivity of the ruling.One official said the WTO panel found that Europe was, in some cases,
unfairly subsidizing Airbus through “launch aid” because the planemaker
only repays the loans as new planes are sold. For some planes, however, the
U.S. failed to demonstrate that the subsidies actually harmed Boeing, a key
requirement for proving wrongdoing.But the three-member panel also found against Airbus’ European backers
Britain, France, Germany and Spain for providing what was ruled illegal
infrastructure support and research and development funding. Officials said
the ruling also confirmed examples of Airbus receiving export subsidies,
which are prohibited under international trade rules.The Geneva trade body can’t force countries or companies to eliminate
subsidies, but it can authorize retaliatory sanctions against countries
that fail to comply with rulings. It generally takes years to reach that
stage, and sanctions could be more than a decade away.Speaking ahead of the ruling, Boeing vice president Ted Austell said the
WTO’s decision was important for “the hundreds of thousands of U.S.
aerospace workers who’ve had to compete with an illegally subsidized
Airbus.““Illegal European subsidies have done great harm to the U.S. aerospace
industry,” Austell said. “It’s time to level the playing field and let
companies compete on product, price, innovation and customer support
without market-distorting government subsidies.“But an Airbus statement said it learned that the ruling rejected Boeing
claims of lost U.S. jobs.Pentagon-Still in talks on longer tanker deadline
By Andrea Shalal-Esa
Reuters
3/23/2010WASHINGTON – The Pentagon said on Tuesday it remains in active talks with
Europe’s EADS on extending the May 10 deadline for aerial tanker bids,
while Boeing Co supporters in Congress seized on a WTO ruling to reject any
deal with the parent of Airbus as reckless.Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said EADS had expressed some
interest in bidding as a prime contractor against Boeing to build 179
refueling planes for the Air Force after its partner Northrop Grumman Corp
bowed out.“We are right now engaged in active discussions with the company to better
understand the reasons why they would need an extension,” Morrell told
reporters at a Pentagon briefing.“I would say those discussions are going very well thus far and we have not
come to a conclusion, and therefore have not made a decision yet about
whether to extend the bidding period any further.“One source who is closely following the discussions said the Pentagon could
announce its decision as soon as Wednesday.Sean O’Keefe, chief executive of EADS North America, told reporters on
Monday that the company expected to hear back from the Pentagon within the
next few days.German Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle on Tuesday said it would be fair
if the U.S. government accepted EADS’ request for a longer period to ready
a bid as a prime contractor.But Boeing backers continued to reject any deal with EADS as unfair to
American workers, particularly after a World Trade Organization panel ruled
that the European government gave some illegal subsidies to Airbus.“We finally have a concrete ruling to justify what we have been saying for
years,” Representative Todd Tiahrt, a Republican from Kansas, where Boeing
has a large plant, said in a statement.“In the midst of an economic recession, we should be doing everything
possible to keep these high-quality jobs here on American soil,” he said.
“Giving a vital national security component like the aerial refueling
tanker to a foreign entity is reckless and extremely dangerous.“Airbus on Tuesday confirmed that a WTO panel had condemned European
subsidies in a confidential ruling, but said the panel dismissed 70 percent
of U.S. claims. It also said the dispute would likely drag on for years.Guy Hicks, spokesman for EADS North America, said the U.S. government had
decided to exempt the rival WTO cases brought by the United States and
Europe from the tanker competition.“The U.S. government has determined that ongoing WTO cases are irrelevant
to U.S. defense acquisition and will not penalize U.S. warfighters by
holding their needs hostage to an ongoing commercial trade dispute,” Hicks
said.Northrop and EADS, the parent company of Airbus, won a projected $35
billion contract to build an A330-based tanker for the Air Force in
February 2008; but the Pentagon canceled the deal later that year after
government auditors faulted the procurement process and upheld a Boeing
protest.Northrop decided earlier this month that it would not compete for the work
this time around, saying revamped rules for the competition favored
Boeing’s smaller 767-based tanker.EADS has been weighing a possible bid on its own, but has said it would
need three months of additional time to prepare the huge amount of
paperwork that would be involved.Morrell told reporters last week that the Pentagon would consider making a
“reasonable extension” to the deadline.Top U.S. defense officials had hoped to have a competition for the airplane
contract, which could be worth up to $50 billion, especially since an
earlier sole-source deal with Boeing collapsed in an ethics scandal in
2004. But they insist that they have mechanisms to ensure that any
sole-source deal with Boeing would be fair.The Obama administration is also under pressure from its European allies,
who reacted angrily after Northrop decided not to bid and warned Washington
against protectionist measures.Even if it got the additional time it requested, EADS would face an uphill
battle with any solo bid.The company would also likely need to find another U.S. defense company to
take on some of the classified work involved in the program, given that
tanker operations are closely linked to the U.S. military’s strategic
planning for future wars.Aerial tankers are used to refuel fighter jets and other military planes in
mid-air, helping the United States project its power around the world.GENERAL AVIATION
Cries of ‘Hey, That’s My Jet!’ Don’t Deter High-End Repo Men
By ROBERT FRANK
The Wall Street Journal
3/20/2010SANFORD, Fla.- Ken Cage is racing through a private aviation terminal near
Orlando when his BlackBerry buzzes with bad news. The plane he is about to
repossess is scheduled to take off for Mexico in three minutes.Even worse, the Cessna’s owner and pilot is on his way back from lunch-and
he is rumored to be six-feet, six-inches tall.“I’d rather not stick around to find out,” Mr. Cage says.
Mr. Cage, 44, stands guard by the door as his partner Randy Craft walks
onto the tarmac and approaches a shiny white turbo-prop. He quickly picks
the lock on the door and ushers in the repo team’s pilot, Dave Larson. The
plane’s propellers roar to life, and after clearance from the control
tower, the $350,000 ride lifts off the runway and into the sky.Mr. Cage and Mr. Craft climb back into their Ford pickup and tear out of
the parking lot, just as the plane’s owner pulls in.“He’s a minute late,” says Mr. Cage, peering out the window. “Lucky for
us.“Ken Cage isn’t your typical repo man. Rather than snatch cars from an
over-extended middle class, he takes back yachts, planes and other toys
from the over-leveraged rich.Business is thriving, even as the economy begins to improve. His company,
Orlando-based International Recovery Group, repossessed more than 700
boats, planes, helicopters and other property last year valued at more than
$100 million. Business, he says, is up six-fold from 2007.He has reclaimed everything from $18 million Gulfstream jets and Bell
helicopters to 110-foot Broward yachts, $500,000 recreational vehicles and
even a racehorse. Before the financial crisis, most of the luxury items he
pulled in were valued between $30,000 and $50,000. Today, they are valued
at $200,000 to $300,000-meaning defaults are hitting people at a much
higher income level.Most repo men take cars and trucks. But Ken Cage and Randy Craft repossess
yachts, planes, helicopters and other luxury toys of the formerly wealthy.
WSJ’s Robert Frank reports.The folly of the wealthy has been good news for an elite cadre of repo men.
Nick Popovich, the self-proclaimed “Learjet Repo Man” and head of
Indiana-based Sage-Popovich, and Michigan boat specialists like Harrison
Marine report brisk business. Reality-TV producers have been knocking on
their doors. Last year, says Mr. Cage, International Recovery’s revenues
soared to the eight figures, up from just a few hundred thousand when he
and two partners bought the company in 2005.Banks hire Mr. Cage to retrieve their collateral after a borrower has
defaulted. Once he grabs the property, he cleans it up or makes needed
repairs and sells it to a new buyer. He then gives the proceeds, minus his
fees and expenses, back to the bank. While the standard commission for most
repossessions is between 6% to 10% of the resale price, Mr. Cage has
lowered his fee to as little as two percent as a way to beat back growing
competition.“They’re very quick in their response time,” says Steve De Amico, vice
president in charge of lending at Illinois-based Allied First Bank, which
hires Mr. Cage for recoveries. “It’s also helpful to have one company that
can get the property, restore it and sell it for us.“Mr. Cage can’t name names. But he estimates that 70% of his targets made
and lost their money from real estate-either as developers, Realtors or
contractors. Most of his jobs are in Florida, Arizona, California, Nevada
and other sun states where real estate was hit hardest.The son of a Philadelphia-area trucking-company owner, Mr. Cage never
planned to land in the rarefied repo ranks. He started out in the
cash-management department of J.P. Morgan, then worked in the collections
department at Chrysler Finance, where he hired repo companies to pick up
cars.Even though he never did the repos himself, he said the work became
depressing.“Here we were, taking minivans with child seats in the back, or going to
someone’s job to take their car,” he says. “I had a tough time with that.“Separating flashy toys from their owners seemed to be much
easier-especially from a logistical perspective. Unlike cars, which can be
hard to find and take, yachts and planes are often traceable through
Federal Aviation Administration or marine records. Mr. Cage relies on a
vast a network of marine captains, tow-boat operators, jet-terminal crews,
dock workers and aircraft pilots who feed him information.With his Phillies cap, jeans, scruffy goatee and genial smile, the stout
Mr. Cage is an unassuming presence. For muscle, he relies on his partner
Mr. Craft, a tall, broad-chested former professional wrestler known as
“Rockin’ Randy.“Mr. Craft prides himself on being able to break into just about anything,
whether boat, plane or RV. Not that planes or yachts are that hard to
steal. Mr. Cage says most yacht owners keep their keys near the ignition
and rarely lock the doors. Plane doors can often be easily picked.“A jet is much easier to take than a car,” he says. His company works with
about 30 pilots, all of whom are experts at flying various kinds of
aircraft.Occasionally, the rich rear up to protect their prizes. Mr. Cage says that
he and Mr. Craft have been hit by cars, threatened with shovels and chased
on foot countless times. Recently, Mr. Cage says he was on a yacht
assignment in Jacksonville, Fla., when the owner boarded another boat and
zoomed after him, Bond-style. He soon gave up the chase, and Mr. Cage kept
his craft.Most repo targets never even know Mr. Cage is coming.
Early one morning at the Hontoon Marina just outside Orlando, Mr. Cage and
Mr. Craft walk along the docks until they spot their prey-a 65-foot Sea
Ray. Mr. Cage says they had been tipped off by a boat captain who saw the
craft ease into the docks the night before without any running lights-a
sign that the owner was trying to avoid notice.Mr. Craft hops onto the boat, finding no one aboard. A telltale pair of
socks and sneakers near the door suggests someone may be headed back soon.After a quick check of the registration number, the team revs up the engine
and backs away from the dock. As they motor down the river, Mr. Cage
reclines in a plush leather chair and takes a moment to soak in the sun.“Someday I’d like to get a boat,” he says. “But I’d pay all cash.“



















