Oklahoma Aerospace ALLIANCE

News Articles March 24, 2010 Part Two

  • March 24, 2010

    Posted on Mar. 24, 2010

    Quick summary of today’s news articles (Full text of articles follows):

    • For wealthy Nigerian businessman Gilbert Chagoury and others like him, a place on the U.S. government’s recently expanded terrorist no-fly list has not turned out to be a major impediment to a jet-setting lifestyle. That’s because a loophole in the Transportation Security Administration’s security regulations does not require any screening for those flying domestically on a privately-owned aircraft, no matter how large.
    • Major General Robert A. Harding (ret.) recently appeared before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for a confirmation hearing to be administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. He sailed through with high praise.
    • As the Senate considered a bill that would set the course for the FAA over the next two years, general aviation supporters in the Senate worked to ensure that the final bill would include benefits for GA.
    • The World Trade Organization ruled that European governments unfairly financed planemaker Airbus’ battle against U.S. rival Boeing, officials said, even as the France-based Airbus claimed the decision as a victory.
    • The Pentagon said on Tuesday it remains in active talks with Europe’s EADS on extending the May 10 deadline for aerial tanker bids, while Boeing Co supporters in Congress seized on a WTO ruling to reject any deal with the parent of Airbus as reckless.

    AVIATION SECURITY

    Want to Fly Through a Loophole in the No-Fly List? Buy a Plane
    By MATTHEW MOSK, ERIC LONGABARDI, and RICHARD ESPOSITO
    ABC News
    3/23/2010

    For wealthy Nigerian businessman Gilbert Chagoury and others like him, a
    place on the U.S. government’s recently expanded terrorist no-fly list has
    not turned out to be a major impediment to a jet-setting lifestyle.

    That’s because a loophole in the Transportation Security Administration’s
    security regulations does not require any screening for those flying
    domestically on a privately-owned aircraft, no matter how large.

    Both TSA officials and FBI Terrorist Screening Center director Timothy
    Healy confirmed to ABC News last week that the effort to keep U.S. airspace
    off-limits to terror suspects has not included vetting the passengers and
    pilots on large private jets such as the one owned by Chagoury, which he
    has used to shuttle between Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York and Europe.

    Greg Soule, a TSA spokesman, said the agency has been working for some time
    on a fix to toughen the restrictions for non-commercial jets.

    “We’re working with industry to strengthen security for private planes that
    have previously gone unregulated,” Soule said.

    No-Fly List Has Doubled Since ChristmasNo-Fly Terror List Includes Big
    Financial Backer of ClintonMore from Brian Ross and the Investigative
    TeamDespite the loophole, Chagoury’s movements did not totally escape
    notice. In January, the wealthy philanthropist, who has been a significant
    financial supporter of former President Bill Clinton, was stopped from
    boarding his private jet as it was undergoing repairs at Teterboro Airport
    in northern New Jersey, according to a report of the incident provided to
    ABCNews.com.

    The report says that law enforcement authorities discovered Chagoury was a
    “positive match” to the Gilbert Chagoury on the terrorism no-fly list,
    based on his date of birth. He was traveling on a British passport, which
    does not require a U.S. visa to enter the country. The report said Chagoury
    was also named on a second watch list called TIDE, the Terrorist Identities
    Datamart Environment, maintained by the National Counterterrorism Center.

    Chagoury’s son, Gilbert Jr., confirmed last month that his father was
    detained by TSA officers at Teterboro. A report of the incident said agents
    from the FBI and Customs and Border Patrol asked Chagoury, four other
    passengers and two crew members to wait for several hours before they were
    permitted to board the jet and depart for Paris.

    The brief detention provided the first public indication that Chagoury had
    been placed on any watch list, and because the government never comments on
    individual names on the no-fly list, it is unknown whether he remains on
    either list. Reached Monday, Chagoury’s son said that neither he nor his
    father wished to discuss the matter.

    A spokesperson for the Terrorist Screening Center last month declined to
    comment about Chagoury. The spokesperson did say the list is “fluid” and
    individuals may be moved up or downgraded at any time based on the current
    threat environment, but “an individual’s social status, financial means,
    and political affiliations are not considered” in an individual being moved
    up or down the list.

    Well before Chagoury was detained, flight records for his Dassault Falcon
    show the private aircraft had been making frequent trips both inside and
    outside the U.S.

    Unlike commercial airline passengers, who are screened against the no-fly
    list both on domestic and international flights, there is no requirement
    that those on the private aircraft be screened during domestic travel,
    according to Healy, who heads the Terrorist Screening Center. Healy said
    that was something the TSA was “working on.“

    The current security rules for non-commercial travelers only impact
    operators of charter aircraft. TSA requires charter companies handling
    flights on large aircraft to properly vet all passengers and employees,
    including checking them against the no-fly list. They also require
    passenger checks for flights entering or leaving the U.S. Those
    requirements could be expanded soon, TSA officials said.

    In October 2008, TSA proposed new security measures for private general
    aviation aircraft. But they encountered resistance from some advocates for
    privately-owned planes. After seeking public comment, the TSA is preparing
    a new set of security rules for aircraft not currently regulated under
    other programs, Soule said.

    “This draft proposal will represent a significant strengthening of general
    aviation security and enhances other post-9/11 measures,” he said.

    Ed Bolen, the president and CEO of the National Business Aviation
    Association, has been monitoring the rules and said he believes the level
    of passenger scrutiny will increase with the takeoff weight of the
    aircraft. “Their reasoning is that large aircraft are significantly more
    capable of doing damage,” he said.

    Soule said the process is “still very much ongoing,” with a period for
    public input expected to come later this year. “Until that time, it is
    premature to draw conclusions about the final rule. Americans can rest
    assured that whatever final policy emerges, it will represent a
    strengthening of general aviation security,” he said.

    In the days since the January incident, it appears that Chagoury has been
    free to continue to take to the skies. His plane crossed the Atlantic twice
    in February, according to publicly available flight records. Described as a
    billionaire, Chagoury runs an industrial conglomerate in Nigeria, the
    Chagoury Group. In 2009 Chagoury pledged $1 billion via the Chagoury Group
    as part of his commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, according to
    the Global Initiative website. Chagoury also recently donated more than $1
    million to the Clinton Foundation, according to a list of donors made
    public by the foundation in December. Members of Chagoury’s family were
    contributors to the 2008 Presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.

    A Clinton spokesman, Matt McKenna, said last month that the former
    President’s office was unaware of the incident until contacted by
    ABCNews.com. “We had no role whatsoever” in helping Chagoury get permission
    to resume his travels, said McKenna. “Nor would we ever,” he added.

    Eric Longabardi is an award-winning producer and investigative journalist
    who is a frequent contributor to the Blotter, ABCNews.com’s investigative
    page.

    TSA nominee sails through confirmation hearing
    Posted by Charles Spence
    General Aviation News
    3/23/2010

    Major General Robert A. Harding (ret.) recently appeared before the Senate
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for a confirmation
    hearing to be administrator of the Transportation Security Administration
    and assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. He sailed
    through with high praise.

    Sen. John “Jay” Rockefeller (D-WVa), committee chairman, declared a highly
    qualified, strong administrator is needed to lead the TSA and its
    workforce. He said Harding’s career in both government and the private
    sector “makes him a good fit for this mission.” Harding had been director
    of operations for the Defense Intelligence Agency and director of
    intelligence for the Army’s U.S. Southern Command, among several other
    positions.

    Rockefeller told Harding he was especially concerned about the security of
    general aviation and would want to talk with him about it if confirmed.
    Rockefeller declared he was not talking about “crop dusters and other small
    aircraft, but jets on up.” He added that general aviation was an issue
    rarely discussed, but one that need discussing.

    Harding is expected to be confirmed by the Senate.

    FAA REAUTHORIZATION

    Senate GA supporters spoke out for industry in FAA bill
    By AOPA ePublishing staff
    AOPA Website
    3/23/2010

    As the Senate considered a bill that would set the course for the FAA over
    the next two years, general aviation supporters in the Senate worked to
    ensure that the final bill would include benefits for GA.

    The $34.5 billion, two-year Senate FAA reauthorization bill, which passed
    93 to 0, focuses on modernizing the air traffic control system. It would
    fund modernization in part by an increase in general aviation jet fuel
    taxes-21.9 cents to 36 cents per gallon-but would not impose any new user
    fees.

    Leading up to the passage of the bill March 22, members of the GA Caucus
    and other GA supporters worked to include provisions in the bill that would
    minimize the burden of regulations on the industry. While not every
    amendment made it to the final bill, senators’ efforts to include GA in
    considerations reflected growing understanding of GA on Capitol Hill.

    Sen. John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate
    Commerce Committee, said “airports are economic engines for many small
    communities, and everyone, everywhere, needs to be connected to our
    national air transportation system.“

    Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.), chair of the aviation subcommittee, spoke on
    the Senate floor about the value of small aircraft-“to travel around the
    state and the country to do commerce, to haul parts, to haul people.“
    Dorgan explained the importance of business aircraft and that GA
    encompasses medical flights, transportation for troops reuniting with their
    families, relief flights to Haiti, and more.

    “The legislation we have created has things that are so important to all of
    aviation-yes, commercial aviation, but to general aviation and to private
    pilots as well,” he said.

    GA Caucus co-chair Mark Begich (D-Alaska) said he was pleased with the
    legislation. “You can’t go wrong with a bill that creates jobs, improves
    the safety and efficiency of air travel, and invests in our airports,” he
    said. “Many of our communities have no road or ferry access. Aviation is
    our lifeline as many Alaskans rely completely on small aircraft to keep our
    communities connected.“

    Mike Johanns (R-Neb.), the other GA Caucus co-chair, proposed amendments to
    ensure that equipment upgrade requirements would show a clear benefit
    without imposing an undue financial burden for small-aircraft owners.

    “It is important to remember that the FAA’s responsibility goes beyond
    large airports and commercial airlines; rural airports and general aviation
    are sometimes hit much harder by federal regulations, which can cause a
    ripple effect in states like Nebraska,” Johanns said. “I am pleased the FAA
    Reauthorization bill now includes specific acknowledgement of these smaller
    yet significant contributors to our state economy and our aviation system
    as a whole.“

    The bill establishes deadlines for equipage with NextGen technologies such
    as Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B); one of Johanns’
    amendments would require the FAA to first publish rules setting the
    standards for equipage so that operators would not absorb the cost of new
    equipment without clear directions from the FAA. Other Johanns amendments
    would require the FAA administrator to identify the benefits of the
    transition to satellite-based navigation for small- and medium-sized
    airports and GA users and require the Government Accountability Office to
    study the impact of increases in aviation fuel prices.

    TANKER CONTROVERSY

    WTO rules against Airbus, sources say
    By BRADLEY S. KLAPPER
    Associated Press
    3/24/2010

    GENEVA – The World Trade Organization ruled that European governments
    unfairly financed planemaker Airbus’ battle against U.S. rival Boeing,
    officials said, even as the France-based Airbus claimed the decision as a
    victory.

    Three officials with knowledge of the confidential WTO ruling Tuesday in
    the long-running trade dispute said it upheld findings of an interim
    decision handed down last September that faulted European governments for
    providing Airbus with subsidies through risk-free loans, research funding
    and infrastructure support.

    Airbus, however, said “70 percent of the U.S. claims were rejected” and
    that the WTO panel dismissed Boeing’s claim that its performance suffered
    as a result of European subsidies. In that case, it would be a victory for
    Airbus and the European Union ahead of a possible June ruling on alleged
    U.S. subsidies to The Boeing Co.

    While the WTO’s report won’t halt European subsidies for Airbus, the two
    disputes could provide tighter guidelines for how far governments can go in
    supporting companies in a market worth more than $3 trillion over the next
    two decades.

    With emerging powers such as China looking to break the two-company
    dominance of the airliner industry, clearer rules on public support will
    become even more important in the future.

    The three officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity
    because of the sensitivity of the ruling.

    One official said the WTO panel found that Europe was, in some cases,
    unfairly subsidizing Airbus through “launch aid” because the planemaker
    only repays the loans as new planes are sold. For some planes, however, the
    U.S. failed to demonstrate that the subsidies actually harmed Boeing, a key
    requirement for proving wrongdoing.

    But the three-member panel also found against Airbus’ European backers
    Britain, France, Germany and Spain for providing what was ruled illegal
    infrastructure support and research and development funding. Officials said
    the ruling also confirmed examples of Airbus receiving export subsidies,
    which are prohibited under international trade rules.

    The Geneva trade body can’t force countries or companies to eliminate
    subsidies, but it can authorize retaliatory sanctions against countries
    that fail to comply with rulings. It generally takes years to reach that
    stage, and sanctions could be more than a decade away.

    Speaking ahead of the ruling, Boeing vice president Ted Austell said the
    WTO’s decision was important for “the hundreds of thousands of U.S.
    aerospace workers who’ve had to compete with an illegally subsidized
    Airbus.“

    “Illegal European subsidies have done great harm to the U.S. aerospace
    industry,” Austell said. “It’s time to level the playing field and let
    companies compete on product, price, innovation and customer support
    without market-distorting government subsidies.“

    But an Airbus statement said it learned that the ruling rejected Boeing
    claims of lost U.S. jobs.

    Pentagon-Still in talks on longer tanker deadline
    By Andrea Shalal-Esa
    Reuters
    3/23/2010

    WASHINGTON – The Pentagon said on Tuesday it remains in active talks with
    Europe’s EADS on extending the May 10 deadline for aerial tanker bids,
    while Boeing Co supporters in Congress seized on a WTO ruling to reject any
    deal with the parent of Airbus as reckless.

    Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said EADS had expressed some
    interest in bidding as a prime contractor against Boeing to build 179
    refueling planes for the Air Force after its partner Northrop Grumman Corp
    bowed out.

    “We are right now engaged in active discussions with the company to better
    understand the reasons why they would need an extension,” Morrell told
    reporters at a Pentagon briefing.

    “I would say those discussions are going very well thus far and we have not
    come to a conclusion, and therefore have not made a decision yet about
    whether to extend the bidding period any further.“

    One source who is closely following the discussions said the Pentagon could
    announce its decision as soon as Wednesday.

    Sean O’Keefe, chief executive of EADS North America, told reporters on
    Monday that the company expected to hear back from the Pentagon within the
    next few days.

    German Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle on Tuesday said it would be fair
    if the U.S. government accepted EADS’ request for a longer period to ready
    a bid as a prime contractor.

    But Boeing backers continued to reject any deal with EADS as unfair to
    American workers, particularly after a World Trade Organization panel ruled
    that the European government gave some illegal subsidies to Airbus.

    “We finally have a concrete ruling to justify what we have been saying for
    years,” Representative Todd Tiahrt, a Republican from Kansas, where Boeing
    has a large plant, said in a statement.

    “In the midst of an economic recession, we should be doing everything
    possible to keep these high-quality jobs here on American soil,” he said.
    “Giving a vital national security component like the aerial refueling
    tanker to a foreign entity is reckless and extremely dangerous.“

    Airbus on Tuesday confirmed that a WTO panel had condemned European
    subsidies in a confidential ruling, but said the panel dismissed 70 percent
    of U.S. claims. It also said the dispute would likely drag on for years.

    Guy Hicks, spokesman for EADS North America, said the U.S. government had
    decided to exempt the rival WTO cases brought by the United States and
    Europe from the tanker competition.

    “The U.S. government has determined that ongoing WTO cases are irrelevant
    to U.S. defense acquisition and will not penalize U.S. warfighters by
    holding their needs hostage to an ongoing commercial trade dispute,” Hicks
    said.

    Northrop and EADS, the parent company of Airbus, won a projected $35
    billion contract to build an A330-based tanker for the Air Force in
    February 2008; but the Pentagon canceled the deal later that year after
    government auditors faulted the procurement process and upheld a Boeing
    protest.

    Northrop decided earlier this month that it would not compete for the work
    this time around, saying revamped rules for the competition favored
    Boeing’s smaller 767-based tanker.

    EADS has been weighing a possible bid on its own, but has said it would
    need three months of additional time to prepare the huge amount of
    paperwork that would be involved.

    Morrell told reporters last week that the Pentagon would consider making a
    “reasonable extension” to the deadline.

    Top U.S. defense officials had hoped to have a competition for the airplane
    contract, which could be worth up to $50 billion, especially since an
    earlier sole-source deal with Boeing collapsed in an ethics scandal in
    2004. But they insist that they have mechanisms to ensure that any
    sole-source deal with Boeing would be fair.

    The Obama administration is also under pressure from its European allies,
    who reacted angrily after Northrop decided not to bid and warned Washington
    against protectionist measures.

    Even if it got the additional time it requested, EADS would face an uphill
    battle with any solo bid.

    The company would also likely need to find another U.S. defense company to
    take on some of the classified work involved in the program, given that
    tanker operations are closely linked to the U.S. military’s strategic
    planning for future wars.

    Aerial tankers are used to refuel fighter jets and other military planes in
    mid-air, helping the United States project its power around the world.

    GENERAL AVIATION

    Cries of ‘Hey, That’s My Jet!’ Don’t Deter High-End Repo Men
    By ROBERT FRANK
    The Wall Street Journal
    3/20/2010

    SANFORD, Fla.- Ken Cage is racing through a private aviation terminal near
    Orlando when his BlackBerry buzzes with bad news. The plane he is about to
    repossess is scheduled to take off for Mexico in three minutes.

    Even worse, the Cessna’s owner and pilot is on his way back from lunch-and
    he is rumored to be six-feet, six-inches tall.

    “I’d rather not stick around to find out,” Mr. Cage says.

    Mr. Cage, 44, stands guard by the door as his partner Randy Craft walks
    onto the tarmac and approaches a shiny white turbo-prop. He quickly picks
    the lock on the door and ushers in the repo team’s pilot, Dave Larson. The
    plane’s propellers roar to life, and after clearance from the control
    tower, the $350,000 ride lifts off the runway and into the sky.

    Mr. Cage and Mr. Craft climb back into their Ford pickup and tear out of
    the parking lot, just as the plane’s owner pulls in.

    “He’s a minute late,” says Mr. Cage, peering out the window. “Lucky for
    us.“

    Ken Cage isn’t your typical repo man. Rather than snatch cars from an
    over-extended middle class, he takes back yachts, planes and other toys
    from the over-leveraged rich.

    Business is thriving, even as the economy begins to improve. His company,
    Orlando-based International Recovery Group, repossessed more than 700
    boats, planes, helicopters and other property last year valued at more than
    $100 million. Business, he says, is up six-fold from 2007.

    He has reclaimed everything from $18 million Gulfstream jets and Bell
    helicopters to 110-foot Broward yachts, $500,000 recreational vehicles and
    even a racehorse. Before the financial crisis, most of the luxury items he
    pulled in were valued between $30,000 and $50,000. Today, they are valued
    at $200,000 to $300,000-meaning defaults are hitting people at a much
    higher income level.

    Most repo men take cars and trucks. But Ken Cage and Randy Craft repossess
    yachts, planes, helicopters and other luxury toys of the formerly wealthy.
    WSJ’s Robert Frank reports.

    The folly of the wealthy has been good news for an elite cadre of repo men.
    Nick Popovich, the self-proclaimed “Learjet Repo Man” and head of
    Indiana-based Sage-Popovich, and Michigan boat specialists like Harrison
    Marine report brisk business. Reality-TV producers have been knocking on
    their doors. Last year, says Mr. Cage, International Recovery’s revenues
    soared to the eight figures, up from just a few hundred thousand when he
    and two partners bought the company in 2005.

    Banks hire Mr. Cage to retrieve their collateral after a borrower has
    defaulted. Once he grabs the property, he cleans it up or makes needed
    repairs and sells it to a new buyer. He then gives the proceeds, minus his
    fees and expenses, back to the bank. While the standard commission for most
    repossessions is between 6% to 10% of the resale price, Mr. Cage has
    lowered his fee to as little as two percent as a way to beat back growing
    competition.

    “They’re very quick in their response time,” says Steve De Amico, vice
    president in charge of lending at Illinois-based Allied First Bank, which
    hires Mr. Cage for recoveries. “It’s also helpful to have one company that
    can get the property, restore it and sell it for us.“

    Mr. Cage can’t name names. But he estimates that 70% of his targets made
    and lost their money from real estate-either as developers, Realtors or
    contractors. Most of his jobs are in Florida, Arizona, California, Nevada
    and other sun states where real estate was hit hardest.

    The son of a Philadelphia-area trucking-company owner, Mr. Cage never
    planned to land in the rarefied repo ranks. He started out in the
    cash-management department of J.P. Morgan, then worked in the collections
    department at Chrysler Finance, where he hired repo companies to pick up
    cars.

    Even though he never did the repos himself, he said the work became
    depressing.

    “Here we were, taking minivans with child seats in the back, or going to
    someone’s job to take their car,” he says. “I had a tough time with that.“

    Separating flashy toys from their owners seemed to be much
    easier-especially from a logistical perspective. Unlike cars, which can be
    hard to find and take, yachts and planes are often traceable through
    Federal Aviation Administration or marine records. Mr. Cage relies on a
    vast a network of marine captains, tow-boat operators, jet-terminal crews,
    dock workers and aircraft pilots who feed him information.

    With his Phillies cap, jeans, scruffy goatee and genial smile, the stout
    Mr. Cage is an unassuming presence. For muscle, he relies on his partner
    Mr. Craft, a tall, broad-chested former professional wrestler known as
    “Rockin’ Randy.“

    Mr. Craft prides himself on being able to break into just about anything,
    whether boat, plane or RV. Not that planes or yachts are that hard to
    steal. Mr. Cage says most yacht owners keep their keys near the ignition
    and rarely lock the doors. Plane doors can often be easily picked.

    “A jet is much easier to take than a car,” he says. His company works with
    about 30 pilots, all of whom are experts at flying various kinds of
    aircraft.

    Occasionally, the rich rear up to protect their prizes. Mr. Cage says that
    he and Mr. Craft have been hit by cars, threatened with shovels and chased
    on foot countless times. Recently, Mr. Cage says he was on a yacht
    assignment in Jacksonville, Fla., when the owner boarded another boat and
    zoomed after him, Bond-style. He soon gave up the chase, and Mr. Cage kept
    his craft.

    Most repo targets never even know Mr. Cage is coming.

    Early one morning at the Hontoon Marina just outside Orlando, Mr. Cage and
    Mr. Craft walk along the docks until they spot their prey-a 65-foot Sea
    Ray. Mr. Cage says they had been tipped off by a boat captain who saw the
    craft ease into the docks the night before without any running lights-a
    sign that the owner was trying to avoid notice.

    Mr. Craft hops onto the boat, finding no one aboard. A telltale pair of
    socks and sneakers near the door suggests someone may be headed back soon.

    After a quick check of the registration number, the team revs up the engine
    and backs away from the dock. As they motor down the river, Mr. Cage
    reclines in a plush leather chair and takes a moment to soak in the sun.

    “Someday I’d like to get a boat,” he says. “But I’d pay all cash.“

OAA University
Give Feedback
  • Southwest United
  • FlightSafety
  • ARINC
  • Lufthansa Technik
  • AAMRO
  • Precise